Last verified 2026-03-19 (left) · 2025-11-26 (right)
GPT-5.4 mini vs Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning — Pricing & Capability Comparison
GPT-5.4 mini charges $0.75 per million input tokens and $4.50 per million output tokens. Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning comes in at $0.20 / $0.50. Context windows span 400K vs 2M tokens respectively.
TL;DR — Quick Comparison
- ✓Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is cheaper overall: $0.70 per 1M tokens (in+out) vs $5.25 for GPT-5.4 mini — saves $4.55 per 1M tokens
- ✓Input pricing: GPT-5.4 mini $0.75/1M vs Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning $0.20/1M
- ✓Output pricing: GPT-5.4 mini $4.50/1M vs Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning $0.50/1M
- ✓Context window: Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning offers more (2M vs 400K)
- ✓Use our calculator below to estimate costs for your specific usage pattern
Input price (per 1M)
GPT-5.4 mini
$0.75
Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning
$0.20
Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning leads here
Output price (per 1M)
GPT-5.4 mini
$4.50
Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning
$0.50
Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning leads here
Context window
GPT-5.4 mini
400,000 tokens
Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning
2,000,000 tokens
Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning leads here
Cached input
GPT-5.4 mini
$0.075
Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning
$0.050
Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning leads here
Which one should you choose?
Skip the spreadsheet if you just need the practical takeaway. Use these rules when deciding between GPT-5.4 mini and Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning.
Choose Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning if input tokens dominate your bill
Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning has the lower input rate, which usually matters most for chat, RAG, classification, and long-prompt workflows where prompt volume stays much larger than generated output.
Choose Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning if you generate long answers
Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is cheaper on output tokens, so it tends to win for report generation, coding assistance, reasoning traces, and any workflow where completions are long.
Choose Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning if context size is the blocker
Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning offers the larger published context window, which is more important than small pricing differences when you need to fit large files, long chats, or multi-document prompts into one request.
Cost comparison for 10K-token workloads
Side-by-side pricing for identical workloads (10,000 total tokens per request) across different distributions.
| Scenario | GPT-5.4 mini | Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning | GPT-5.4 mini cached | Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning cached |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Balanced conversation 50% input · 50% output | $0.0262 | $0.0035 | $0.0229 | $0.0027 |
Input-heavy workflow 80% input · 20% output | $0.0150 | $0.0026 | $0.0096 | $0.0014 |
Generation heavy 30% input · 70% output | $0.0338 | $0.0041 | $0.0317 | $0.0037 |
Cached system prompt 90% cached input · 10% fresh output | $0.0112 | $0.0023 | $0.0052 | $0.0009 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper: GPT-5.4 mini or Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning?
Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is cheaper for input tokens at $0.20 per 1M tokens compared to $0.75. For output, Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning costs $0.50 per 1M tokens versus $4.50 for GPT-5.4 mini.
What is the cost per 1M tokens for GPT-5.4 mini?
GPT-5.4 mini pricing: $0.75 per 1M input tokens and $4.50 per 1M output tokens. Context window: 400,000 tokens.
What is the cost per 1M tokens for Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning?
Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning pricing: $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output tokens. Context window: 2,000,000 tokens.
How much does it cost per 1K tokens?
Per 1K tokens: GPT-5.4 mini costs $0.0008 input / $0.0045 output. Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning costs $0.0002 input / $0.0005 output. This is useful for calculating small-scale usage costs.
Which model supports a larger context window?
Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning offers 2,000,000 tokens (2M) versus 400K for GPT-5.4 mini.
What is the estimated monthly cost for typical usage?
For a typical workload of 10M input + 2M output tokens per month: GPT-5.4 mini would cost approximately $16.50, while Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning would cost $3.00. Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is more economical for this usage pattern.
Do these models support prompt caching?
GPT-5.4 mini supports prompt caching at $0.075 per 1M cached tokens, reducing costs for repeated context by up to 90%. Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning supports caching at $0.050 per 1M tokens, saving up to 75%.
Which model is best for my use case?
Choose Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning for cost-sensitive applications with high input volume. Choose Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning if you need 2M context for long documents or conversations. Consider prompt caching if you have repeated context. Use our token calculator to model your specific usage pattern.
Keep exploring this decision
Start from the pricing hub to compare calculators, cost pages, and top decision paths.
Estimate GPT-5.4 mini cost with your own token mix.
Estimate Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning cost with your own token mix.
Model the same prompt volume across multiple models before you commit.
See a simplified 100K-token cost view for GPT-5.4 mini.
See a simplified 100K-token cost view for Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning.
Jump to other side-by-side model pricing comparisons.