Last verified 2025-11-26 (left) · 2026-04-21 (right)

Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs Kimi K2.6 — Pricing & Capability Comparison

Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning charges $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens. Kimi K2.6 comes in at $0.95 / $4.00. Context windows span 2M vs 262K tokens respectively.

TL;DR — Quick Comparison

✓Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is cheaper overall: $0.70 per 1M tokens (in+out) vs $4.95 for Kimi K2.6 — saves $4.25 per 1M tokens
✓Input pricing: Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning $0.20/1M vs Kimi K2.6 $0.95/1M
✓Output pricing: Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning $0.50/1M vs Kimi K2.6 $4.00/1M
✓Context window: Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning offers more (2M vs 262K)
✓Use our calculator below to estimate costs for your specific usage pattern

Input price (per 1M)

Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

$0.20

Kimi K2.6

$0.95

Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning leads here

Output price (per 1M)

Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

$0.50

Kimi K2.6

$4.00

Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning leads here

Context window

Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

2,000,000 tokens

Kimi K2.6

262,144 tokens

Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning leads here

Cached input

Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

$0.050

Kimi K2.6

$0.160

Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning leads here

Which one should you choose?

Skip the spreadsheet if you just need the practical takeaway. Use these rules when deciding between Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and Kimi K2.6.

Choose Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning if input tokens dominate your bill

Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning has the lower input rate, which usually matters most for chat, RAG, classification, and long-prompt workflows where prompt volume stays much larger than generated output.

Choose Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning if you generate long answers

Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is cheaper on output tokens, so it tends to win for report generation, coding assistance, reasoning traces, and any workflow where completions are long.

Choose Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning if context size is the blocker

Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning offers the larger published context window, which is more important than small pricing differences when you need to fit large files, long chats, or multi-document prompts into one request.

Cost comparison for 10K-token workloads

Side-by-side pricing for identical workloads (10,000 total tokens per request) across different distributions.

Scenario	Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning	Kimi K2.6	Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning cached	Kimi K2.6 cached
Balanced conversation 50% input · 50% output	$0.0035	$0.0248	$0.0027	$0.0208
Input-heavy workflow 80% input · 20% output	$0.0026	$0.0156	$0.0014	$0.0093
Generation heavy 30% input · 70% output	$0.0041	$0.0309	$0.0037	$0.0285
Cached system prompt 90% cached input · 10% fresh output	$0.0023	$0.0125	$0.0009	$0.0054

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper: Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning or Kimi K2.6?

Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is cheaper for input tokens at $0.20 per 1M tokens compared to $0.95. For output, Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning costs $0.50 per 1M tokens versus $4.00 for Kimi K2.6.

What is the cost per 1M tokens for Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning?

Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning pricing: $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $0.50 per 1M output tokens. Context window: 2,000,000 tokens.

What is the cost per 1M tokens for Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 pricing: $0.95 per 1M input tokens and $4.00 per 1M output tokens. Context window: 262,144 tokens.

How much does it cost per 1K tokens?

Per 1K tokens: Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning costs $0.0002 input / $0.0005 output. Kimi K2.6 costs $0.0009 input / $0.0040 output. This is useful for calculating small-scale usage costs.

Which model supports a larger context window?

Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning offers 2,000,000 tokens (2M) versus 262K for Kimi K2.6.

What is the estimated monthly cost for typical usage?

For a typical workload of 10M input + 2M output tokens per month: Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning would cost approximately $3.00, while Kimi K2.6 would cost $17.50. Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is more economical for this usage pattern.

Do these models support prompt caching?

Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning supports prompt caching at $0.050 per 1M cached tokens, reducing costs for repeated context by up to 75%. Kimi K2.6 supports caching at $0.160 per 1M tokens, saving up to 83%.

Which model is best for my use case?

Choose Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning for cost-sensitive applications with high input volume. Choose Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning if you need 2M context for long documents or conversations. Consider prompt caching if you have repeated context. Use our token calculator to model your specific usage pattern.