Infrastructure Hub

Hub

AI system architecture and optimization

Explore Infrastructure Hub Hub
Technology

GPU Performance: Compute vs Memory-Bound (90% vs 20% Utilization - 2025)

Master GPU performance optimization: Matrix multiplication achieves 90%+ FLOPS on A100, while CNNs get only 20% due to memory bandwidth bottleneck. Learn compute-bound vs memory-bound operations, fused kernels, Tensor Cores, and H100 FP8 improvements.
xiaodong gong
3 min read
#Technology#AI#Innovation#GPU#GPU optimization#Memory bandwidth#A100#H100

GPU Performance from First Principles

The Core Challenges of GPU Performance

At the heart of modern AI and high-performance computing lies the GPU. But unlocking its full potential isn't always straightforward. To truly optimize performance, we need to understand the fundamental bottlenecks.

Diagram illustrating the core challenges of GPU performance

  1. Challenge 1: Compute-Bound vs. Memory-Bound Operations

    Not all tasks are created equal. Some operations, like large matrix multiplications, are compute-bound; their speed is limited by the GPU's raw number-crunching power. In contrast, operations common in convolutional networks are often memory-bound, bottlenecked by how quickly data can be moved from memory to the processing units. This distinction is a key reason for the success of Transformers—their architecture heavily favors matrix computations, allowing them to fully leverage the immense computational horsepower of modern GPUs.

    Illustration of compute-bound vs memory-bound operations

  2. Challenge 2: Underutilized Memory Bandwidth

    Modern GPUs boast staggering memory bandwidth, but are we always using it effectively? A common issue is low instruction-level memory efficiency. In simple terms, a single instruction often fails to request enough data to saturate the GPU's massive memory pipeline. This leaves precious bandwidth on the table, creating a hidden performance ceiling.

    Visualization of underutilized memory bandwidth in a GPU

Strategies for Maximizing Throughput

Diagram showing strategies for maximizing GPU throughput

Another strategy for maximizing GPU throughput

A third strategy for maximizing GPU throughput

A Look at Concrete Implementations

Diagram of a concrete implementation of GPU architecture

Note: The SM-to-SM (Streaming Multiprocessor) interconnect is not depicted in this diagram.

Diagram showing SM-to-SM interconnect

Another diagram of a concrete implementation

Q1: The Future of CPUs and GPUs: Will One Dominate the Other?

A1: It's less about domination and more about specialization. While GPUs excel at throughput for parallel tasks, their single-thread efficiency and latency are significantly lower than CPUs. Furthermore, hardware optimizations from vendors are reaching a point of diminishing returns, with no revolutionary breakthroughs on the immediate horizon.

A helpful analogy is the "controller vs. worker" model. In any efficient system, you have far more workers than controllers (workers >> controllers). The CPU acts as the high-level controller—managing tasks, handling complex logic, and directing traffic. The GPU is a massive team of specialized workers, executing parallel instructions with incredible speed.

Given this dynamic, CPUs will likely maintain their crucial role as the system's orchestrator, while GPUs will continue to evolve as powerful, specialized co-processors. The future is collaborative, not competitive.

Illustration of the collaborative future of CPUs and GPUs

Q2: How will GPU architecture evolve?

A2: GPU architecture will advance on several key fronts. We can expect to see enhanced data representation capabilities, dedicated hardware for sparse matrix acceleration, and more sophisticated VRAM hierarchies. On the physical level, innovations in advanced chip packaging (like chiplets) and new transistor fabrication processes will continue to push the boundaries of performance and efficiency.

Diagram showing the evolution of GPU architecture with chiplets and new fabrication

Q3: How will AI models co-evolve with hardware?

A3: AI models will become increasingly hardware-aware. The trend is moving towards using lower-precision data types (like FP8 or INT4) to fully leverage the massive throughput of specialized hardware like Tensor Cores. Additionally, techniques like weight sparsification will become more common, allowing models to run faster and more efficiently by reducing the overall computational load.

References

Explore More in Infrastructure Hub

This article is part of our Infrastructure series. Discover more insights and practical guides.

Visit Infrastructure Hub

About This Article

Topic: Technology
Difficulty: Intermediate
Reading Time: 3 minutes
Last Updated: July 25, 2025

This article is part of our comprehensive guide to Large Language Models and AI technologies. Stay updated with the latest developments in the AI field.

All Articles
Share this article to spread LLM knowledge