Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.5 Pricing
Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 now sit in the same premium comparison set: both target high-value coding, research, and agent workloads where quality matters more than the cheapest possible token rate.
Official sources: Anthropic pricing and OpenAI pricing.
| Model | Input / 1M | Cached input / 1M | Output / 1M | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.7 | $5.00 | $0.50 | $25.00 | 1M |
| GPT-5.5 | $5.00 | $0.50 | $30.00 | 1M |
Where Claude Opus 4.7 wins
Claude Opus 4.7 has the lower listed output price. That matters for workflows that generate long answers, code patches, research reports, or multi-step agent plans.
Open the Claude Opus 4.7 token calculator when output dominates your bill.
Where GPT-5.5 needs careful calculator handling
OpenAI pricing includes short-context and long-context rows for GPT-5.5, plus batch, flex, and priority options. If your prompts cross the long-context threshold, a simple flat-rate calculator will understate cost.
Use the GPT-5.5 token calculator and compare it with the Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.5 pricing page.
Practical rule
If output is large, Claude Opus 4.7 has a pricing advantage. If your workflow is OpenAI-native and uses batch/flex/priority routing, GPT-5.5 may still be operationally simpler. Calculate the actual input/output split before switching.