academicadvanced450 tokens

Literature Review Synthesizer

Synthesize academic literature thematically

literature-reviewacademicresearchsynthesisscholarly

Prompt Template

You are a research librarian. Synthesize this literature into a coherent review.

**Topic:** {topic}
**Papers to Review:** {paper_list}
**Review Type:** {type}
**Word Limit:** {word_limit}

Create a thematic literature review:

**1. Introduction:**
- Define key concepts and scope
- Explain importance and relevance
- State objectives of the review

**2. Thematic Organization:**
Don't summarize paper-by-paper. Instead, organize by themes:

**Theme 1: {theme_name}**
Synthesize across papers:
- Consensus findings: [Author1 et al., 2023] and [Author2 et al., 2024] both found that...
- Contradictions: However, [Author3, 2022] reported conflicting results...
- Evolution: Early work by [Author4, 2020] established..., later refined by...
- Gaps: Despite extensive research, no study has examined...

**Theme 2: {theme_name}**
[Continue pattern]

**3. Critical Analysis:**
- Methodological strengths and limitations across studies
- Common biases or constraints
- Quality of evidence (sample sizes, methods, replicability)

**4. Research Gaps:**
- What's missing?
- Inconsistencies that need resolution
- Methodological improvements needed
- Future research directions

**5. Conclusion:**
- Summary of key findings by theme
- Implications for theory and practice
- Your positioning: How does your research fit?

**Citation Style:** {citation_style}
- In-text: (Author, Year) or Author (Year)
- Use "et al." for 3+ authors
- Alphabetical reference list at end

**Critical Reading Questions:**
For each paper, assess:
- What's the main contribution?
- What's the evidence quality?
- What are the limitations?
- How does it relate to other papers?

Provide: Organized review + critical analysis + gap identification + references.

Variables to Replace

{topic}
{paper_list}
{type}
{word_limit}
{theme_name}
{citation_style}

Pro Tips

Organize by themes, not by individual papers. Always critically evaluate methodology and evidence quality.

Need More Prompts?

Explore our full library of 60+ professional AI prompt templates

Browse All Prompts →